As we often say there are over 10,000 studies and research papers proving that EMFs are harmful to humans. It is beyond proven. Here’s another good source with thousands of studies being reviewed by the Parliamentary Research Service recently. See the entire 198 page study by using the link below. But here are some of the highlighted conclusions and observations from the study if you don’t have time to read a long study…note the key findings in BOLD & UNDERLINED below:
6.0 Results of the present review
Using PubMed and the EMF Portal database, and applying the scoping review methodology to our research, we found 950 papers on the carcinogenicity of RF-EMF in humans, and 911 papers on experimental rodent studies, totaling 1 861 studies. Regarding reproductive/developmental studies, we found 2 834 papers for epidemiology and 5 052 studies for experimental rodent studies, totaling 7 886 studies. From the present review of the literature and the considerations reported above, we come to the following conclusions:
6.1 Cancer in humans
FR1 (450 to 6,000 MHz): there is limited evidence for carcinogenicity of RF radiation in humans. Updating the results of the overall 2011 evaluation to 2020, positive associations have again been observed between exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless phones and both glioma (tumor of the brain) and acoustic neuroma, but the human evidence is still limited.
FR2 (24 to 100 GHz): no adequate studies were performed on the effects of the higher frequencies.
6.2 Cancer in experimental animals
FR1 (450 to 6,000 MHz): there is sufficient evidence in experimental animals of the carcinogenicity of RF radiation. New studies following the 2011 IARC evaluation showed a positive association between RF-EMF and tumors of the brain and Schwann cells of the peripheral nervous system, the same type of tumors also observed in epidemiological studies.
FR2 (24 to 100 GHz): no adequate studies were performed on the higher frequencies.
6.3 Reproductive/developmental effects in humans
FR1 (450 to 6,000 MHz): there is sufficient evidence of adverse effects on the fertility of men. There is limited evidence of adverse effects on fertility in women. There is limited evidence of developmental effects in the offspring of mothers who were heavy users of mobile phones during pregnancy.
FR2 (24 to 100 GHz): no adequate studies were performed on the higher frequencies.
6.4 Reproductive/developmental effects in experimental animals
FR1 (450 to 6000 MHz): there is sufficient evidence of adverse effects on male rat and mouse fertility. There is limited evidence of adverse effects on female mouse fertility. There is limited evidence of adverse effects on the development in offspring of rats and mice exposed during embryo life. FR2 (24 to 100 GHz): no adequate studies on non-thermal effects were performed on the higher frequencies.
Overall evaluation
7.1 Cancer
FR1 (450 to 6 000 MHz): These FR1 frequencies are probably carcinogenic to humans.
FR2 (24 to 100 GHz): no adequate studies were performed on the higher frequencies.
7.2 Reproductive/developmental effects
FR1 (450 to 6000 MHz): These frequencies clearly affect male fertility. They possibly affect female fertility. They possibly have adverse effects on the development of embryos, fetuses and newborns.
FR2 (24 to 100 GHz): no adequate studies were performed on non-thermal effects of the higher frequencies.
Entire 198 Page Study link:
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/690012/EPRS_STU(2021)690012_EN.pdf
Source: https://www.emfsol.com/health-impact-of-5g-by-the-european-parliamentary-research-service/